Recent events have raised concerns about the Ghanaian judiciary’s decision-making processes, with some questioning the logic and fairness of certain court rulings. The case in question involves a judge revisiting a ruling after dismissing the court, sparking debate about the principles of finality in judgments and natural justice.
The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of finality in judgments, stating that once a court has ruled, it becomes functus officio, unless specific legal steps are followed. However, the recent case has raised questions about whether these principles were upheld.
The order for an individual to deposit GH¢2 million in cash with the court registry less than than two hour has been criticized as unrealistic and ungrounded in reality. The basis for the judge’s conclusion that Abusuapanyin Kofi Owusu Tupac had spent GH¢2 million on funeral preparations has also been questioned.
The Ghanaian public is calling for transparency and accountability in the judiciary, emphasizing that justice must not only be done but also be seen to be done. The judiciary’s image has been dragged through the mud, and it’s imperative that steps are taken to restore public trust.
The judiciary is urged to review the case and ensure that justice is served, and that the principles of fairness and transparency are upheld.