Accra, Ghana – Justice Dzamefe has come out strongly against a proposal to extend the retirement age of Supreme Court judges from 70 to 75 years. According to Justice Dzamefe, judges should retire healthy and be available for assessments and other engagements if needed.
The Debate on Mandatory Retirement Age.
The debate on mandatory retirement age for judges is not unique to Ghana. In other jurisdictions, such as the United States, there are varying views on the matter. Some argue that a mandatory retirement age can lead to the loss of experienced and wise judges, while others believe it’s necessary to ensure the judiciary remains vibrant and efficient.
Arguments Against Extension
Justice Dzamefe’s stance aligns with those who believe that judges should retire at a certain age to make way for younger, potentially more energetic and innovative judges. This view is supported by some who argue that older judges may experience cognitive decline, impacting their ability to serve effectively.
Benefits of Retirement
Retiring judges at 70 could also allow them to pursue other engagements and assessments, contributing to the legal field in different capacities. This could include sharing their experience and wisdom through teaching, writing, or participating in legal reform initiatives.
The proposal to extend the retirement age of Supreme Court judges in Ghana has sparked a crucial debate about the role of age in judicial service. Justice Dzamefe’s opposition highlights the complexity of the issue and the need for careful consideration of the potential implications. Ultimately, the decision will depend on weighing the benefits of experience against the potential drawbacks of aging in the judiciary.